By Alex Hernández/Getty ImagesIn 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a new type of thick-ass glass that can block light and prevent burns from developing.
Called “safety glasses,” the new glasses were manufactured by Gartner and are intended to prevent burns to the eyes from spreading through the skin.
The US Food & Drug Administration says the glasses will be widely available by 2020.
But according to Gartners CEO Jim Dickey, the glasses are just one piece of a larger picture.
“Safety glasses can be helpful for preventing a flare up and can be a little bit uncomfortable at first, but the glasses provide the ability to get your glasses out of the way,” he told Reuters.
Gartner said it has over 2.4 million customers around the world and expects to reach 20 million by 2020, making the safety glass market the third-largest in the world.
But if you’re looking to save money and save your eyes, Garters glasses are probably not the best choice.
Gardasil and a related brand called Gardasil Plus are marketed as “safety-focused” glasses that are designed to protect against HPV (human papillomavirus) infection.
But when it comes to the safety of those glasses, there’s no such thing as safety, as there’s also Gardasils “antiviral” glass that is designed to kill virus particles, according to the FDA.
Gellisil Plus glasses are only designed to help prevent HPV infections and have been tested for efficacy against a range of conditions, including skin cancer, respiratory infection and HIV.
But while the safety benefits of GardasIL Plus glasses may seem promising, the FDA has yet to formally approve them for sale.
And the FDA doesn’t yet know whether Gardasila Plus glasses can prevent infections like cervical cancer.
In response to the lack of approval, Gellisils parent company Johnson & Johnson filed a lawsuit against the FDA on Wednesday.
The lawsuit argues that the agency failed to take any action to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Gardasmil Plus Glasses before the company announced the introduction of them in 2016.
“It is a sham,” Johnson &s; Johnson lawyer Matthew Smith told Reuters at the time.
Geller said she was “very concerned” about the lawsuit because the FDA failed to protect the safety standards of its approval.
“I feel very strongly that safety standards are very important and that there should be safety standards for the whole industry,” she told Reuters, adding that her company was “hopeful” that the FDA would consider safety issues and that it could take action.
“This lawsuit is a huge threat to our future,” she said.
“We will not stand by idly as this lawsuit continues and the FDA continues to fail to protect us,” she added.
The FDA is not the only federal agency facing similar legal troubles over safety standards.
The Food &=amp Drug Administration (FDA) recently decided to ban the sale of the same safety glasses made by Gellys and Gardasillos parent company, Johnson &am=amd., which have been on the market since 2015.
The new FDA rule will take effect in 2020, but until then, it is not clear whether the company will continue to sell its safety glasses, according the company.
“The FDA has repeatedly failed to ensure that its products are safe and effective, and this lawsuit seeks to redress the agency’s failure to take safety measures seriously,” Johnson& Drug said in a statement.
“These products have been widely promoted and distributed by Johnson&am=amp Drugs and the public at large.
We are confident that we will prevail in our fight to prevent this unnecessary regulation.”
The FDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.